Ideas & writing

A library of arguments, observations, and unfinished questions.

Policy notes, public essays, field writing, poetry, and research ideas at different stages of development. Every item is labelled by what it is, and what it is not.

01 / Policy notes

Research shaped for a decision.

The Pass Rate Is Not the Outcome

A proposed evaluation framework for asking whether BC's Mandatory Entry-Level Training program produces consistent training, work-ready graduates, and a system that learns from carrier evidence.

Built from BCTA's public road-test analysis. The note distinguishes test performance from job readiness and proposes four evaluation lenses: provider consistency, first-job transition, early safety performance, and the feedback loop between carriers, trainers, and regulators.

Evidence available
Public aggregate analysis and independent evaluation design
Evidence needed next
Carrier interviews, provider-level data, early employment outcomes, and safety indicators

The classification and evidence boundary are stated explicitly.

Community Care in Action

A BIA-driven service model for responding to homelessness, mental-health challenges, addiction, public-space safety, and fragmented civic responsibility in Gastown.

The project combined research with evidence from businesses and service providers. Rather than erase their conflicting accounts, it identified a shared operational gap: the absence of coordinated, rapid communication between businesses and outreach teams.

Evidence available
16 service-provider interviews and responses from 36 businesses
Evidence needed next
Protocol pilot, response-time measures, and participant feedback

The classification and evidence boundary are stated explicitly.

Maternal-Health Access in Bella Bella

An applied research project examining the barriers that rural and remote Indigenous patients encounter when seeking maternal-health information, services, nutrition support, and continuity of care.

The work explored how low-connectivity environments, limited local services, travel requirements, and fragmented information shape access. It produced a service concept, not a claim to speak for community members or replace community-led design.

Evidence available
Applied research and service-concept development
Evidence needed next
Community-led validation, patient journeys, and Indigenous data-governance review

The classification and evidence boundary are stated explicitly.

02 / Essays

Arguments that keep the person inside them.

More than Stewards

On Indigenous leadership, clean-energy labour shortages, and what a more honest green-transition conversation must admit.

Read context +

The essay challenges language that recognizes Indigenous communities only as environmental stewards while overlooking ownership, governance, workforce leadership, and decision-making authority.

A transition cannot be called inclusive if Indigenous communities appear only in its acknowledgements. Stewardship is not a substitute for authority. The more serious questions concern who owns the infrastructure, who defines the work, who develops the workforce, and who retains the value created on the land.

Edited portfolio excerpt. The argument is presented in its stated genre, not as completed policy research.

The First Explanation Is Never the Complete Explanation

What field research in Jharkhand and observation in Vancouver reveal about explanations that isolate individual behaviour from land, poverty, gender, institutions, and power.

Read context +

The essay does not claim that distinct places or experiences are equivalent. It reflects on a recurring analytical failure: treating the most visible explanation as though it were the entire system.

The first explanation is often the one a system already knows how to record. A superstition. A disturbance. A failure to comply. Fieldwork begins when that explanation is treated as an opening rather than a conclusion, and when the surrounding questions of land, gender, poverty, authority, and institutional response are allowed back into view.

Edited portfolio excerpt. The argument is presented in its stated genre, not as completed policy research.

Invited, Then Asked to Leave

A first-person examination of how immigration systems welcome educational credentials while labour systems can render the same credentials economically invisible.

Read context +

The argument connects lived experience with occupational classification, underemployment, and the political language of skill. It is presented as an essay, not as completed labour-market research.

The invitation arrived through a points system that could count education precisely. After arrival, the labour market translated the same education into uncertainty. The contradiction is not simply personal disappointment. It raises a policy question about how one part of the state recognizes skill while another economy renders it conditional.

Edited portfolio excerpt. The argument is presented in its stated genre, not as completed policy research.

Before You Come to Canada

The distance between migration's public image and the private experience of surviving after arrival.

Read context +

A narrative essay about work, dignity, money, shame, and the stories migrants often protect their families from hearing. The personal account is not presented as representative of every newcomer experience.

There is the Canada described before departure, and the Canada explained quietly after arrival. Between them are jobs not mentioned in family calls, calculations made in grocery aisles, and the strange work of protecting the people at home from the cost of the decision they helped you make.

Edited portfolio excerpt. The argument is presented in its stated genre, not as completed policy research.

For published pieces and new writing beyond this portfolio:

Read on Substack

03 / Poetry

Where the argument stops explaining itself.

Burning Dry

It's burning and bleeding drySaffron, white and greenHues of rainbow in between

A poem on nation, identity, violence, and the colours made to carry them. Only a brief excerpt is reproduced here.

04 / Open research questions

Not conclusions. Invitations to investigate.

These entries make uncertainty visible. Each one separates a provisional hypothesis from the evidence still required.

01Developing

What does Canada actually mean by skill?

Why it matters
Educational attainment, occupational classification, immigration selection, and the work a person can actually obtain do not always describe the same thing.
Working hypothesis
Deskilling may be produced not only by employer bias, but by the interaction between immigration selection, occupational categories, licensing systems, and the requirement for Canadian experience.
Evidence needed
Occupational mobility data, classification history, employer interviews, immigrant-worker accounts, licensing rules, and wage trajectories.
02Early inquiry

Who is permitted to define safety in contested public space?

Why it matters
Businesses, residents, service providers, street-involved people, police, and municipal agencies can experience the same place through radically different forms of risk.
Working hypothesis
Safety policy becomes less effective when one group's immediate experience is treated as the complete definition of the problem.
Evidence needed
Participatory interviews, incident and service-call data, outreach records, public-space observation, and analysis of decision authority.
03Concept development

What would maternal-health access designed from Bella Bella look like?

Why it matters
A service designed around urban connectivity, specialist availability, and short travel distances can reproduce exclusion in rural and remote communities.
Working hypothesis
The most useful intervention may be a coordinated information and navigation layer governed with community, rather than another isolated digital application.
Evidence needed
Community-led research, patient journeys, service inventories, connectivity constraints, referral pathways, and Indigenous data-governance requirements.
04Developing

When does compliance strengthen a program, and when does it narrow what care can look like?

Why it matters
Public funding rules create accountability, but they can also shape eligibility, timelines, documentation burdens, and the kinds of support staff can provide.
Working hypothesis
The operational design of compliance systems determines whether accountability and participant-centred delivery reinforce or undermine one another.
Evidence needed
Contribution agreements, staff workflows, audit findings, participant journeys, administrative burden, and comparative program models.